My entire life, I’ve always been fascinated by the power of communities.
More recently I’ve started to wonder about why it is that humans come together in such a unique way.
Why do people participate in communities?
What is it that makes a community exist? They don’t just sprout up for no reason. There must be psychological justifications that explain what it is that brings people together.
Looking at research conducted to date, there’s one theory that has held up against the test of time and a great deal of research.
In 1986, social psychologists McMillan & Chavis formed this theory that has become the most widely accepted understanding of how communities work.
They called it the “Sense of Community”.
They described their theory in one sentence:
“Sense of community is a feeling that members have of belonging, a feeling that members matter to one another and to the group, and a shared faith that members’ needs will be met through their commitment to be together (McMillan, 1976).
They go on to describe the four factors that contribute to a sense of community.
Let’s dig in a bit into what they believed served as the psychological justification for the existence of communities and talk about how you can apply each factor to make your community as healthy as possible.
As you read them, think about the most healthy, successful community that you’re a part of. Do they have these factors?
The four factors are:
1. Membership
Membership is the feeling of belonging or of sharing a sense of personal relatedness.
It includes five attributes:
1. Boundaries – How do people become members and what are the boundaries keeping others out
2. Emotional safety – By building boundaries and including the right people, you create trust and a feeling of safety
3. A sense of belonging and identification – Members must feel like they fit in and that this is “their community”
4. Personal investment – If members contribute or make sacrifices to the community, it enhances their sense of community
5. A common symbol system – Sharing a symbol like a sports team jersey or gang colors creates a sense of community
So it’s important to not just invite anyone and everyone to your community. Think about what you want your community to be about and who would make your community better. Make sure that anyone who joins is going to be a good fit.
By setting boundaries to getting into a community, you make members feel special and create a higher level of trust.
Then think about what else you can do to make users proud to be a member using things like symbols. Think power user programs, logos and branding.
2. Influence
The second element is influence, or a sense of mattering. It has to work both ways, with members feeling like they have influence over the community and the community having influence over the members.
Influence also speaks to the concept of giving first before asking for anything. The theory states that:
“People who acknowledge that others’ needs, values, and opinions matter to them are often the most influential group members, while those who always push to influence, try to dominate others, and ignore the wishes and opinions of others are often the least powerful members.”
Create an environment in your community where members feel like they have a say in what happens.
Each member should know that someone is listening, no matter what, even if it’s just the community manager.
And for a community to have influence over its members, it simply has to become a place that they care about. It has to provide them with value that they don’t want to lose.
3. Integration and Fulfillment of Needs
This essentially means that by joining a community a member gets what they hoped to get by joining.
It reinforces the idea that your community, like any other product, needs to solve a problem for its members in order to make it worth their time and contribution.
A reward might be something specific like an answer to a question or networking. Or it could be something a bit more intangible like a sense of belonging, a support network, thoughtful conversations, inspiration, etc.
Members need to feel rewarded in some way for their participation in the community in order to continue to contribute.
This is why it’s really important to talk to your users and get a really good idea of who they are. Then you can understand their needs and how the community can best serve them.
4. Shared Emotional Connection
All healthy communities have a story. Members will have a history of experiences together and the belief that there will be more experiences together in the future.
McMillan & Chavis provide an example:
“This is the feeling one sees in farmers’ faces as they talk about their home place, their land, and their families; it is the sense of family that Jews feel when they read The Source by James Michener (1965).”
These experiences form a long lasting, emotion connection. That’s why a community that goes through a crises often comes out much stronger because they’ve now shared a difficult situation, forging a strong emotional bond amongst members.
This factor is believed to be the “definitive element for true community”.
What kinds of experiences can you manufacture for the members of your community? Events? Something unique that they won’t forget? Maybe it’s just a good, honest debate where people get heated but end up stronger afterward.
—
Does your community have these 4 factors? Now that you understand why people participate in communities, how can you take this knowledge and apply it to what you’re building?
Community Science has also developed a quantitative analysis of the “sense of community” as a way to measure the healthy of a community
—
Photo Credit: Liz Henry via Compfight cc
David Spinks, Co-Founder TheCommunityManager.com was a part of the TCM team from the site's inception through 2014. He utilized TCM to create the first CMX conference in San Francisco in February 2014, and then ultimately severed ties with TCM and its co-founders.
TheCommunityManager.com, CMXSummit and LetsFeast.com. Lifelong student, community builder and writer.
Solid list! Thank you for pulling together that research Spinks!
thomasknoll thanks for reading (=
Great article. I will use this as a blueprint for future community building strategies
excellent article. Makes the solid point about what a community should and should not be.
Great article David, and excellent analysis of the factors that make up the sense of community. I really enjoyed reading the article.
HiSocial thanks for reading (=
Great article, I find this website and article’s like this. Thank you!
Thanks for this article, David, I shall check out that study because I love doing research on communities.
While I agree with nearly all the attributes mentioned above, I have to oppose the first one  which talks about boundaries for membership. While a somewhat exclusive membership might make the already existing members feel special, it will on the long run hinder your community from growing. Potential new members will shy away from joining this exclusive club. I realise that it’s bold to disagree with research study but from my 11+ years experience with communities (both as member and as staff) I can say that exclusiveness does not make joining a more attractive option. I’d be very curious to hear about your personal experience with this 🙂
I used to describe a community like this: A community is a place where people go because of a shared interest or need and they end up staying because of the connections they’ve created with the other members (extrinsic and intrinsic motivation:Â http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation) In that sense all the other attributes make perfect sense 🙂
manekidenise I hear what you’re saying. The research doesn’t say a community must be exclusive though. It’s referring to membership, and specifically boundaries. Boundaries can be an invite only system, or it can just be a culture where some people feel like they belong and others don’t. I’ve honestly never seen a community succeed that didn’t have some sort of boundaries in place either on purpose or as a result of the culture.
DavidSpinks Thanks for your reply! 🙂 I agree that a community needs a culture which makes the members feel special and that gets enforced by setting rules (for example no trolling or spamming). You don’t want chaos in your community and for that purpose boundaries are useful, in the end a community functions a bit like a state just on a smaller level and you NEED rules. But I still don’t see how a community is more likely to thrive if you make it invite only. I strongly believe that everyone should be welcome to join and it should be very easy to do so and after that first step you can either become part of the community by contributing and building relationships with others or – if you’re just a troll – you’ll soon be leaving again.
What I’m trying to say is that you should be careful how you interpret the need for boundaries. In my opinion they shouldn’t hinder anyone from joining but they should make it hard to stay for the wrong people.
I’ve managed communities where it was very easy for anyone to join and communities where you needed a special kind of account in order to write something. The healthier communities were always the ones where anyone could post and I will always prefer that approach (including a good filter for bots and spam of course).