A lot of business experts will tell your company to “engage” people and “build community”, but what does that actually mean?
It’s important, when hearing advice like this to ask “why?” and “to what end?”.
The why, for me, has always been to create a positive emotional connection with users, resulting in a user experience that exceeds a simple matter of supply and demand.
If someone were to build the same exact product as you, it’s the community that would keep your users around.
With that goal in mind, after years of experimenting with different forms of engagement, I realized that there’s a logical flow of engagement that all communities take. This flow, when done right, results in finding your product market fit and organic growth.
It’s called…
A lot of people think about it in a straight line… like this:
User to Product –> User to Brand –> User to User
That’s wrong. It’s a cycle because ultimately, the goal is to improve the product and user activity.
The focus on improving engagement between users (step 3) should have the goal of improving engagement between the user and the product (step 1).
Let’s break it down so you can see how it’s cyclical…
Step 1: User to Product: People get value out of your product and they want to come back and use it again.
Step 1 -> Step 2: User to Brand: Because they like your product and keep coming back, they develop an emotional connection to your brand.
Step 2 -> Step 3: User to User: Then because they feel an emotional connection to your brand, they begin to connect with other users who share that emotional connection.
Step 3 -> Step 1: User to Product: A userbase that is highly engaged with the brand and with each other makes the product more valuable (community as a feature), uses the product more often, and provides you with a clear product roadmap based on real users’ needs.
So… the Community Manager should have two goals:
1. To facilitate the cycle because 99.999% of the time, it won’t happen naturally at first. If a community isn’t automatically forming, the CM should be reaching out to users, engaging them with your brand, and then connecting them with each other.
Note: If your product really sucks (doesn’t solve a problem or fulfill a desire), this is pretty much impossible.
2. Educate the product roadmap until the product is so engaging in itself that the cycle occurs naturally. That’s what product-market fit looks like and that’s when you can start to scale your business.
Lets dig in a little deeper into each phase…
1. User to Product (Engaged Userbase)
In order to build a community, your product needs to solve a problem or fulfill a desire. If you’re providing a product that people actually enjoy using, they’ll feel engaged with that product. How engaged people are with your product will depend on how much value they get out of it.
A well designed product with an intuitive user interface that creates value and keeps people coming back will create an emotionally engaged userbase.
2. User to Brand (Engaged Audience)
Once someone is engaged with your product, you’ll want to get them engaged with your brand. This can happen in one of two ways:
1. Your product is so good that your users automatically feel engaged with your brand.
2. Talking to people. You can talk to people through social media, through customer service by being very responsive, through events, emails, phone calls etc.
If you get in the habit of having genuine conversations with your engaged users, you’ll be able to create an engaged audience.
3. User to User (Engaged Community)
Now you have an engaged audience of people who feel an emotional connect with your brand and product. Time to start connecting them with each other. You can do so using conversation platforms like forums, facebook groups or build something yourself.
This too, may happen naturally. Again, 99.999% of the time, it won’t at first. You have to facilitate it.
By creating an emotional connection between users, they no longer perceive themselves as just a customer. Now, they’re a part of a community that they care about. You’ll have yourself a community of highly engaged users with a strong emotional connection with your brand, helping guide your product toward organic growth.
“If the goal is to build an amazing product, why not just focus on product?”
Apple is a terrible example for a lot of business cases because their products are perceived to be on such a different level, but the reason they’re on that level is because they’ve reached the point where this cycle is happening organically. It only took them a couple decades and almost going bankrupt to figure it out.
So yes, technically, you can focus 100% on your product without manually facilitating any “user-to-brand” or “user-to-user” engagement. But they can only help you reach the organic cycle faster and more efficiently.
Now go! And build something epic.
David Spinks, Co-Founder TheCommunityManager.com was a part of the TCM team from the site's inception through 2014. He utilized TCM to create the first CMX conference in San Francisco in February 2014, and then ultimately severed ties with TCM and its co-founders.
TheCommunityManager.com, CMXSummit and LetsFeast.com. Lifelong student, community builder and writer.
Great model.
And an excellent point about Apple: “It only took them a couple decades and almost going bankrupt to figure it out.” Because people tend to forget that Apple did pay their dues. You don’t get there overnight.
Really, really well thought out model, Spinks.Â
 @dshanahan Thanks brother.
 @TomBLogue every company does… one way or another.
This is an interesting breakdown Dave, and I definitely agree – not a line but a cycle, very well illustrated. The User to Brand bit is that special, mystery sauce that everyone’s trying to figure out, right? This is very dependent on the kinds of resources the brand is willing to allocate. For a tech or web-based product, this ranges from customer support (and with that, dedicated dev time to squash bugs, for example, and fast response times from agents), sales (providing seamless support from pre-sales to paid customer, with just as much attention at each level), community (interesting, relevant, and original shareable content on blogs, forums, social media, etc), and culture (relevance to people’s daily lives, making the brand “personable” and “relate-able” – and often even balancing internal culture with it). You’re 100% right: investing resources in these areas as need ramps up is as integral to the success of the product as having a “good product” is. I’d wager you can even have an average product, but if you had outstanding engagement and attention to user needs, you’d be set.
 @kgunette I think that each phase of the cycle is something that a lot of brands are trying to figure out.  They’re all extremely important and may require a “special sauce” of their own.
Â
Totally spot on about having outstanding user to brand and user to user engagement making up for what your product lacks. Â That said, your product can’t be completely worthless, or you won’t get any engagement anywhere. Â The goal is to keep this cycle moving. Â If it’s not happening naturally, that means your product isn’t quite there yet, and you need to manually increase engagement in step 2 and 3 until it does get there. Â At least, that’s how I see it.
Â
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts Kar. Â Yea…you call me Dave, I get to call you Kar. Â (=
 @DavidSpinks FYI: I immediately regretted pushing publish while writing “Dave” – apologies all around, and really interesting ideas here. And definitely agreed: worthless product = no engagement.